Also noticed that even running slow output, Full Carbon and Full GFO, that phosphates test (show up in the output). Tank is about .05 - no nitrates, nitrites or ammonia. The reactor output was .025 is this normal or should it be .00? Just in case I changed 100% of the GFO media but, still .025 immediately after.
I'm running API test kits.What test are you using? and make sure not to add more then the suggested amount or it can drop your alk.
I ran full sps tank at .01 no issue. Give it time to come down. If it doesn't them all a little more. You never want 0 no3 and p04 gotta have some nutrients in the system
Not trying for 0 no3 but since the tank is only a month old, no real no3 yet. I', trying for near .025 tank level po4, just perplexed that the reactor is .025, so not sure how it gets the tank from .05 to .025.
Thanks for your input.
Attached pic of the reactor and sumpView attachment 13090
Hmmm... I have seen so many articles on how long GFO should last and how much, but, best guess is about 1 cup per 65 gallons, the BRS reactor holds just less than 3 cups and I used 1 cup on day 1, by the next day output matched tank level .05. So I replaced it and filled it (just less than 3 cups) and ran it for a day before I tested output, which was .025. So... since I didn't test full media when I replaced it, I don't know output level, so I replaced the media again and immediately tested output level and it was .025. So... not sure if I should slow the output down to get to zero or let it do it's thing for a week or so.Ok maybe I'm not understanding correctly but by your discription the gfo is doing what you want it to do. Lower po4. The reactor output will not be zero if your not using enough media to make it zero
Hmmm... I have seen so many articles on how long GFO should last and how much, but, best guess is about 1 cup per 65 gallons, the BRS reactor holds just less than 3 cups and I used 1 cup on day 1, by the next day output matched tank level .05. So I replaced it and filled it (just less than 3 cups) and ran it for a day before I tested output, which was .025. So... since I didn't test full media when I replaced it, I don't know output level, so I replaced the media again and immediately tested output level and it was .025. So... not sure if I should slow the output down to get to zero or let it do it's thing for a week or so.
I hate to buy something else, since the BRS is new. Would you suggest slowing it down?Interesting...There's no way you need 3 cups of gfo. I used 1/2 a cup on my 150 yo drop just under 2 one hundredths. Can also be flow threw reactor. Gfo should have a slight tumble unlike carbon. Which is y I don't like the brs design. My $0.02
I hate to buy something else, since the BRS is new. Would you suggest slowing it down?
Yep I agree, I have a Hanna 713 on order. The shades of green are hard to read.I'd suggest better test kits such as salifert
Again it's just my opinion based on my researchand trials. Gfo need higher flow than carbon. If you that concerned you can always try the lc route. I've used that and have passed it on to others and all have had success. Lanthium chloride that is.
Since the tank is new, and I don't really have a phosphate problem yet, wouldn't you think LC is a bit the nuclear option?Again it's just my opinion based on my researchand trials. Gfo need higher flow than carbon. If you that concerned you can always try the lc route. I've used that and have passed it on to others and all have had success. Lanthium chloride that is.
When I replaced it (after a day) it was clump free. Just curious if anyone is testing GFO output and if they are seeing zero from the reactor. Again, the tank is new, all RO/DI water 1ppm from 1st DI into 2nd DI then 0ppm output on the DI. I used rock from the 57g crash with no light for 30 days, so I'm sure that's the source of the phosphates, but, considering 100lbs of new clean dead rock, I don't see a phosphate problem yet. But... since the 57 crashed, I'm hyper sensitive.+1, GFO needs a tumble to keep clean and clump free. If GAC is run at the same rate it'll tumble, grind up and be bad for the tank (HLLE for example.)
When I replaced it (after a day) it was clump free. Just curious if anyone is testing GFO output and if they are seeing zero from the reactor. Again, the tank is new, all RO/DI water 1ppm from 1st DI into 2nd DI then 0ppm output on the DI. I used rock from the 57g crash with no light for 30 days, so I'm sure that's the source of the phosphates, but, considering 100lbs of new clean dead rock, I don't see a phosphate problem yet. But... since the 57 crashed, I'm hyper sensitive.