thinkfuture
Member
Well said Joe. It truly comes down to:
Lesser price = no guarantee => Less risk for Business & more risk for consumer (Most LFS)
More Price = Better Guarantee => Moderate Risk for Business & Moderate Risk for consumer (Few LFS)
Very High Price = 14 Day Guarantee => High risk for Business & Low risk for consumer (I can only think of DFS here)
It's all about How much you can afford & how much risk you can take. Similar to electronic items, no warranty = no price, 1 Year Warranty = $x, 3 Year = $y. When mechanical & electronic items have this & we take it without complaining, then why crib about Live stock & blame LFS for losses.
It's like blaming Walmart/Best Buy/Tiger Direct for your Sony TV breaking when you have not purchased extended warranty for extra price.
Lesser price = no guarantee => Less risk for Business & more risk for consumer (Most LFS)
More Price = Better Guarantee => Moderate Risk for Business & Moderate Risk for consumer (Few LFS)
Very High Price = 14 Day Guarantee => High risk for Business & Low risk for consumer (I can only think of DFS here)
It's all about How much you can afford & how much risk you can take. Similar to electronic items, no warranty = no price, 1 Year Warranty = $x, 3 Year = $y. When mechanical & electronic items have this & we take it without complaining, then why crib about Live stock & blame LFS for losses.
It's like blaming Walmart/Best Buy/Tiger Direct for your Sony TV breaking when you have not purchased extended warranty for extra price.